When a trait depends on testosterone and when not – co-option into a reproductive context as a key? (#265)
Since
the initially discovery that secondary sexual traits are controlled by a
circulating substance by Berthold (1848) many experiments confirmed that
typical male traits are under the influence of testosterone in vertebrates.
However, these studies also revealed that there is a large variability in the
strength and extent of this relationship as testosterone profiles may be related
to the type of mating system, degree of parental care, development of sexually
selected traits, immuno-competence, and territorial defence, to cite a few. One
particularly challenging issue is the fact that many male-specific morphological
and behavioural traits that are usually associated to high testosterone levels
are often expressed also when the production of gonadal androgens is very low. Several
hypotheses have been advanced for explaining these special cases, such as local
production of steroids or high sensitivity that make extremely small amounts of
androgen sufficient to develop and/or activate the trait. Evidence supporting
one of these hypotheses has been obtained in a number of case studies. Nevertheless,
there is no general theory which allows us to predict what traits can be
expected to be under control of testosterone. Such a theory would be
particularly useful to study ecological and evolutionary aspects of behaviour,
where the interest in the hormone-behaviour relationships has grown enormously
in the last two decades. Here we propose that the testosterone-sensitivity of a
trait depend on its co-option into the reproductive context during the
evolutionary process and its present role within this context. If the trait has
gained importance (and is still important) in male-male or male-female
interactions related to reproduction, we predict that this trait will be
influenced by circulating testosterone levels. If, on the contrary, the trait
did not evolve or is not shown in its present form within a reproductive
context, we predict that its expression will not be associated to fluctuations
in the levels of the hormone.